JunkScience.com is devoted to exposing bad intellectual inquiry in all aspects of modern academic hard and soft science, including psycho-social/cultural inquiry. Why would we ignore such a target rich battleground?
I can’t help you if you insist that JS is just about medical or climate claims that are based on junk science. After all public policy and public attitudes are affected as much by junk social science claims as bad hard science, and scientific methodology is a general strategy to find the truth.
Here is an essay on why the left needs to cheat and lie on science and systematically ignores evidence of their failed ideology.