Sir Cooper, American psychologist ex pat to England shows why we can’t trust social scientists

To restate the theme of this essay about the ideas of a famous psychologist in Britain who advocates for more funding and a better attitude about the Social Science:

Sir Dr. Cooper, psychologist, says, to paraphrase:

Social Science are important and desperately needed–trust me, I am a Social Scientist. We need to tell the world how to organize societies and we need more funding for the wonderful research we are doing to prove how important our ideas are.

Can I laugh here at his pretense?

My short response to his arrogance is–your research and ideas and policy proposals are pregnant with your ideological baggage–you are an impediment to good intellectual inquiry and the social sciences are a bag of twaddle because you cheat on your research to prove up your theories and ideology. You suffer from incurable ideologically driven confirmation bias and tunnel vision.

Social sciences attract people who want to meddle. That compromises the integrity of their research and allows for the fudging and cheating that they do constantly to prove up their preferences and biases.

So Sir Cooper (so important in English academia he got knighted) proposes that social sciences are important because society must be made safe and good for people.

In the same way psychiatry is important, sure it is important, but not necessarily effective and salutary for society in its practice and methodology. Sure there are good and effective psychiatrists, but is psychiatry as practiced good or bad for its patients in many areas–unfortunately it is bad as practiced by many–pushing diagnoses and pills is not beneficial if mindless.

As for social sciences, political science, sociology, psychology, and all the variation–sure they are important but often they are corrupt and cause more harm than good because of ideologically driven bad science that creates bad conclusions and recommendations. Does the good outweigh the bad???

However these smart asses can’t be trusted because their ideology gets in the way of good social sciences and effective social and civic policy.

Note that the writer up front claims that limited government is a bad approach–get the picture–big government run by ruling class smart ass leftists is the answer–George Orwell predicted it. WE need more social science meddlers, more funding for the army of nannies who have no common sense and a distorted vision of the human condition and the way to healthy societies.

For starters, how could a socialist fever swamp like academic social sciences be good for society–didn’t they count the deaths engineered by socialist governments for the 20th century?

As William Voegeli explains so well, socialists are misguided, often wrong but never in doubt about their superiority, Sir Dr. Coopeer fits the profile.

Leftist oligarchs are driven by collectivist/socialist compassion, empathy and pity, and an extremely high opinion of themselves–so they suffer the vice of hubris. Frequently they adhere to bad, not good social policies because they are governed by ideology and emotion, not the skeptical scientific method.

Hubris saturates this essay about social sciences as the way to improving society and the human condition.

My irritation with these people is how bad their research and policy proposals are–they have no sense–they live and breathe their leftist statist ideology and jigger research to excuse their overwhelming desire to tell people how to live in their socialist utopian construct.

These people are so poorly informed that they think socialist statism is the solution to social and civic problems.

Big Brother cares, don’t you love big Brother.


One response to “Sir Cooper, American psychologist ex pat to England shows why we can’t trust social scientists

  1. Moral busybody Cooper’s thoughts remind me of the following:

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”

    ― C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s