The Inconvenient Truth About Climate Policy

If you can’t argue the facts, you use the propaganda tools like cahbahn pollution because we all just know that’s black, evil stuff. I think they are overestimating the temperature effect.

Science Matters

A succinct summary accessible to anyone.  Reading it is like watching the claIms building up to make the house of cards climate policy really is.

See it here at US News and World Report

“Let’s use our imagination and assume that China reduces its emissions by 20 percent by 2030. That gets us two tenths of a degree. Throw in a 30 percent reduction by Europe and Japan and the rest of the industrialized world, also by 2030. That’s another two tenths of a degree, for a grand total of 0.425 degrees, under a “climate sensitivity” (loosely, the effectiveness of greenhouse gas reductions) assumption 50 percent greater than that adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its latest assessment report. Is an effect that small worth 1 percent of global GDP, or roughly $600 billion to $750 billion per year, inflicted disproportionately upon the world’s poor?”

“Such propaganda terms as “carbon…

View original post 133 more words


4 responses to “The Inconvenient Truth About Climate Policy

  1. Geologist Down The Pub Sez

    By all means, let us proceed to ban dihydrogen monoxide, the vapor of which is the most effective greenhouse gas of all.

    And thousands of people died from it last year.

    And it is used in many insecticides and fungicides.

  2. THE FORCE they cannot hide

    AGW (Anthropologic Global Warming) is the latest in a ~500 year effort by foolish world leaders to hide a FORCE they cannot control after Copernicus reported a giant fountain of energy at the gravitational center of the solar system in 1543.

    Atomic bombs at the end of WWII revealed the fountain’s source of energy, but nations and the national academies of science were united into a giant, world-wide Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science (UN)Truths on 24 Oct 1945 to prevent public knowledge of NEUTRON REPULSION, the Force of Creation & Destruction of Matter in cores of galaxies, ordinary stars, some planets and all atoms heavier than ~150 amu (atomic mass units), including uranium and plutonium atoms that:

    1. Vaporized Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 & 9 Aug 1945 and

    2. Induced insanity (loss of contact with reality) in humanity

    FEAR, driven by Aston’s warning that Earth might be converted into a star [1], convinced leaders of independent nations and national academies of science to ignore the basic tenets of democratic government and science, and:

    _ a.) Marie Curie’s admonition: “Nothing is to be feared. It is to be understood.”

    _ b.) Max Planck’s insight [2] into reality: “There is no matter as such!”

    _ c.) Paul Kuroda’s revelation [3] when viewing Hiroshima’s ruins in Aug 1945: “the beginning of the world may have been just like this.”

    Now as NEUTRON REPULSION is revealed as the energy used to power the cosmos, the Sun and to endow us with “inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” . . .

    the remainder of Max Planck’s 1944 speech [1] assures us, There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together . . . We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.”

    We humans are each products of a FORCE guided by a conscious and intelligent Mind that mortal leaders cannot control or manipulate:


    1. F. W. Aston, “Mass spectra and isotopes,” Nobel Prize Lecture (12 Dec 1922). Aston’s promise and warning on nuclear energy are in the last paragraph.

    2. Max Planck, a speech in Florence, Italy in 1944, entitled “Das Wesen der Materie” (The Essence/ Nature/ Character of Matter) Quelle: Archiv zur Geschichte der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Abt. Va, Rep. 11 Planck, Nr. 1797:

    3. P. K. Kuroda, The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon (Springer, 165 pages, Dec 1982). The quote is on pp 2-3.

  3. I like this piece 🙂


  4. Rocket J Squirrel

    You are racy-iist blaming carbon for AGW, it is obviously the positive feedback from white clouds.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s