Research misconduct? And who pays for it?

Flawed, irreproducible biological research cost in the US estimated to be $28. Low research standards leading to sloppy research or just outright fraud?From Nature,  Irreproducible biology research costs put at $28 billion per year

Scientists in the United States spend $28 billion each year on basic biomedical research that cannot be repeated successfully. That is the conclusion of a study published on 9 June in PLoS Biology1 that attempts to quantify the causes, and costs, of irreproducibility.

John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist at Stanford University in California who studies scientific robustness, says that the analysis is sure to prompt discussion about the problem — but should be taken with a pinch of salt, given that its estimates carry great uncertainty.

But Len Freedman, the study’s lead author and head of the non-profit Global Biological Standards Institute in Washington DC, says that the work is of value, even though it cannot pin down the size of the problem. “Clearly, there are tremendous inefficiences [in research], and this is putting a spotlight on that,” says Freedman, whose group seeks to develop best practices for biological experiments.

Inefficiences?  The problems stem from Overall, the team found that poor materials made the largest contribution to reproducibility problems, at 36%, followed by study design at 28% and data analysis at 26%. The team estimates the overall rate of irreproducibility at 53%, but cautions that the true rate could be anywhere between 18% and 89%. That puts the potential economic cost of irreproducibility anywhere from $10 billion to $50 billion per year.

It sounds more like sloppy research, funded without any checks and balances.

Steven Hayward at Powerline suggests that they go straight to the Journal of Irreproducible Results.

Would Nature conduct the same investigation in climate science?


One response to “Research misconduct? And who pays for it?

  1. Frankly speaking, the National Academy of Sciences betrayed the American public after WWII, when frightened world leaders united nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) into a giant, worldwide “Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Scientific Truths” on 24 Oct 1945:

    My research mentor, the late Dr. Paul Kazuo Kuroda, probably risked his life by retaining possession of Japan’s atomic bomb design for fifty-seven years,

    to prevent growth of this sinister and dishonest side of post-WWII consensus science:

    The US National Academy of Science confirms its continuing dishonesty by refusing to address or debate precise experimental evidence, “The Sun’s pulsar core made our elements, birthed the solar system, and sustains every atom, life and world in the solar system today.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s