Enviro nut cases, WHO, chemophobes, after Roundup.

You can see these jerks coming from miles away–ooooooo–it’s a carcinogen, maybe, probably, could be.

Then the precautionary principle takes over.

thanks Joyce, for the link.

Scientific American article so read with care–these people are lefty enviros.

They front for the whores of the scientific world who do work for the enviros–private and public.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/widely-used-herbicide-linked-to-cancer/

Advertisements

3 responses to “Enviro nut cases, WHO, chemophobes, after Roundup.

  1. If you buy a lottery ticket, would the Precautionary Principle require a $10,000(?) savings deposit ‘just-in-case’ you don’t win?

  2. I cancelled my subscription to that leftist magazine years ago because they were pushing the whole global warming BS by presenting only one side of the debate.

    One commenter wondered why no one was concerned about roundup’s effect on animals.
    The answer is simple, it doesn’t harm animals and animals don’t vote.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s